Samsung Electronics sent out a warning to its staff on the potential dangers of leaking confidential information within the wake of the incidences, saying that such information is not possible to retrieve as it's now saved on the servers belonging to OpenAI. Would you be involved in refining your argument into a extra structured piece that tackles these potential objections head-on? Your argument that this system is not a conspiracy however a ‘convenient convergence of interests’ among elites is especially nuanced, because it avoids oversimplification whereas still highlighting systemic points. The emphasis on individualism, revenue-pushed motivation, and the marginalization of collectivist ideologies (like socialism) can indeed be seen as a cultural mission perpetuated by elites throughout politics, media, and industry. For individuals who profit from the system: Elites in media, politics, and enterprise are unlikely to welcome such an evaluation as a result of it exposes the logic that underpins their legitimacy. I have claimed, typically in a joking tone, that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are essentially the most achieved purveyors of hyperreality, however what they achieve is merely the surface of one thing extra complex, created and maintained by generations of elites in politics, the media, industry, advertising, schooling and the arts who have willingly been drawn into its commanding logic and inculcated it in the general inhabitants.

What may those that really feel threatened by it point to as credible weaknesses? ‘This is just anti-capitalist rhetoric.’ Critics might argue that your thesis is solely a veiled attack on Free DeepSeek online markets and individualism, dismissing it as leftist ideology.